🔗 Share this article

In a recent appearance, actor Jude Law remarked he “didn’t fear any repercussions” for portraying Vladimir Putin in a new film. This production, though, may align so closely with the carefully constructed version promoted by Russian state media that, domestically, it reads as a endorsement instead of a critique.

The Crafted Superhero

Over a long period, the Russian political apparatus and the country's pop-culture machine have worked together to forge a made-to-measure persona of the president. This character is a political superhero devoid of flaws, a former spy reframed as a Russian James Bond who consistently understands more than he reveals.

“Domestically, the manufactured Putin has long eclipsed the real one.”

Screen-Based Support

A notable instance is a TV series launched last October, helmed by a Kremlin supporter. Its main character is a fictional blue-eyed lieutenant colonel selected by fate to “rescue” Russia from disorder. Although he is called a different name, the implication is clear: the savior must be a known figure from the secret services.

International depictions frequently result in reinforcing this same narrative rather than undercutting it. A new film based on a bestselling satirical novel sets out to undermine the leader's mythology by presenting him as a symptom but as a consequence, shifting the focus to the political machinery around him.

The Myth of the Reluctant Leader

In the film, the president is shown as having been picked by influential figures to stabilise the country because he is “a fit former intelligence agent”. The oligarchs approach him and all but beg him to take the top job. He replies is that he would prefer to rule from the background, desiring permanent power.

This narrative is a key piece of state propaganda: the detached, unwilling mastermind guided by fate. In reality, none of this took place.

The Truth Behind the Selection

Nobody actually pleaded with him to take the job. The presidency was in essence a casting call with many candidates. At the centre to the selection stood a powerful businessman from the Yeltsin era who expected to run the country in practice.

• The shortlist included various figures, including a reformer later murdered and a former spy chief.
• According to an expert who researched his rise, the chosen candidate simply fitted the required parameters: loyal, from the security services, and not a communist or a liberal.
• A businessman close to the events said the primary requirement was controllability and faithfulness, not strength.

“They didn’t need a powerful leader, they needed someone malleable, someone who would obey orders.”

Constructing the Spy Legend

Experts agree that the notion of him as a master operative was built after the fact. Stories about his clandestine activities in Dresden do not stand up to scrutiny. Fundamentally, he was an administrator and technical tasks, a low-level clerk not involved with field operations.

Interestingly, the shift to framing him as a “spy” could partly have been triggered by Daniel Craig’s arrival as James Bond. His harder version prompted local outlets and social media to draw visual parallels with their leader. Edited images swapping the actor's likeness with Putin’s appeared on Moscow streets, fueling the increasing trend to frame him as a Russian 007.

A Diplomatic Opportunity?

With Jude Law, an actor popular with viewers there, the authorities are likely to seize the opportunity to portray this choice as a minor diplomatic triumph. The film's exclusion of mass protests, the opposition, or key figures in the story, even though it includes the past decade, is a welcome aspect for official messaging.

Domestically, Putin is often an omnipotent figure who never appears directly. He is hinted at through photographs or orders from on high. In this new film, he at last gets a recognizable face—one that could unintentionally validate the very myths it might seek to question.